Nutrition †Food Essay

In our todays confederation, particularly western countries, the issue of unshakable forage seems to be at the aggrandizement of every wellness related debate. As these debates become much controversial, the doubt of who bears the responsibility remains un resolveed. In his turn up, Dont Blame the Eater, David Zinczenko attempts to answer this key question by placing the gr extinguisher responsibility of Americas obesity and other unfaltering nutriment related wellness issues on the card-playing victuals industries. distant to Zinczenkos business, Raldy Balko, in his essay, What You Eat Is Your Business, states that, mess should take ownership of their health and well-being, and be at that placefore responsible for what and how they eat. Although both(prenominal) Zinczenko and Balko address the issue of responsibility, though with contrast, solely valid arguments, Zinczenko seems to present a more convincing argument collect to the way in which he explains the poli tics of solid intellectual nourishment, the way in which our livenessstyles are altered by what we eat, and occasions we flock do to change the way we see feed and its role in our continues.Although Zinczenko hold consumers responsible to an ex ext, he blames the betting intellectual nourishment industries for the rising lay out of obesity and other health issues related to fast victuals due to their failure to provide cross offs for their products. Zinczenko convincingly supports his claim by noning statistical entropy that shows the rise in money spent to treat diabetes. Before 1994, diabetes in children was gener tout ensembley caused by a genetic disorder only 5 per centum of childhood cases were obesity related, or Type 2 diabetes.Today, harmonise to the National Institutes of Health, Type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes in this country(Zinczenko 392). He argues that, if the fast food companies are regulated so t hat they are responsible for their food contents, by providing proper labels, than consumers ordain make certifyed food choices. Contrary to Zinczenko, Balko argues that what one eats should be a matter of personal responsibility. To Balkos credit, I believe that people should take personal responsibility for their health by adding a sensible diet and exercise to their routines.Where I dissent from Balko is when he says that government restrictions on food are a declaration of people making poor food choices. According to Balko, a society where everyone is responsible for everyone elses well-being is a society more sharp to accept government restrictions (397). I think Balkos argument in this regard, is a selfish one, and is an attempt to exempt the rich from paying their unclouded share of taxes that would otherwise benefit the poor or whatever position families who cannot afford the high cost of health insurance.Both Zinczenko and Balko seem to turn spur on the rising hea lth costs that are somehow a result of fast food, these two authors seem to differ on reasons. Zinczenko argues that health care cost is on the rise because of diseases caused by fast food due to the failure of fast food companies to provide labels and that consumers should not be blame for it. However, Balko argues that it is so that, we allow the government to come between us and our waistline (396).Balko states that, the more the government continues to fund health issues that are compute attribute of poor food/health choices, the more people will continue to dine on fast food and engage not in an effective diet and exercise regimen. (398) The growth of the fast food industry and the rate at which fast food is consumed is so fast, and its incident risks of obesity and related cardiovascular diseases leave become a societal epidemic. Zinczenko blames the fast food industries for the spring in the rate to which obesity cede grown in the United States. up to now though Zinczenko is right or so the rising rate of obesity, and that the consumption of fast food forms part of its etiology, the thesis of his argument cannot be proven and therefore cannot form the basis for his claims against the fast food companies since there are other contributing factors regarding the cause, onset, and progression of obesity. corpulency is also biologically linked. These biological attributors include genetics, hormones, enzymes, and vitamins and minerals. Some people find fat in their genes that, no matter what they do, they are just fat.Others allow issues with hormonal imbalances and or in tolerable enzymatic actions that would aid in the adequate digestion and absorption of certain foods. Fast food is just one of the some environmental attributes associated with obesity. So Zinczenko can accurately make his case against the fast food industries for providing labels so as to enable consumers make informed food choices and not a case of obesity. Some ms, people are t oo fast to pass judgment on others, especially people that are obese. I am equally culpable of the accusation myself.I work as a nurse at a nursing home induction and, in most cases, when staff member comes to me complaining of headache, first thing I say to them is lets check your blood printing press and, God forbid, the blood pressure is elevated, or if that person just grammatical construction fat to me, my next comment is, it is because of all the junk you eat. My judgment, though may be incorrect, is based on the fact that most of these staff members are single parents, live in inner cities, and amaze a fare commute time of two hours to and from work.Not to mention, some of them have more than one job. However, these people are being made to feel guilty about something that is totally out their control. In most instances, their wages arent even enough to meet up with their rents and utilities bills. Fast food comes accomplished in such instance where one can spend ten dollars and find ten cheeseburgers to feed a family of three to five versus expiry to the grocery store where each healthy ingredient is almost tantamount(predicate) to the price of the entire dinner comprising of fast food.People fall back on fast food because it is cheap. Zinczenko explains that his parents were split up and that he had to live with his mother who worked long hours just to make the monthly bills. Lunch and dinner, for me, was a daily choice between McDonalds, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken or Pizza Hut. (Zinczenko 391). In Zinczenkos case, his lifestyle is altered because fast food is his only option since his family is dysfunctional. His single mother has to work very toilsome to pay bills and provide him a meal. It doesnt matter the kind of meal.A meal is a meal, especially for someone who doesnt have the time to prepare a home cooked meal. The people afflicted with fast food related obesity are not to blame for what they eat because they have very littl e or no options regarding what they eat due to all of the above reasons. However, to Balkos point, while people may not have the option about what they eat, they have the option to control how they eat. Zinczenko states in his essay that fast food is the only available options for an American kid to get an affordable meal, and so, he urges his readers not to blame the Eater (392). scarcely as with Zinczenko, we are well aware of the role fast food play in our lives. We understand that, though fast may be one, or the only available meal choice that we have, the way we eat can help us determine the role these foods play in our lives. Zinczenko supports his argument about the role food play in his life by giving information about his pre-college weight. By age 15, I had packed 212 pounds of torpid tallow on my once lanky 5-foot-10 frame (392). Even Zinczenko believes that, consumers are as equally responsible for the way they eat.However, he maintains his argument that the fast food co mpanies bare the gr feeder responsibility. In conclusion, both the eater and the producer are responsible for fast food related obesity, but I believe that the fast industries should bare the greater responsibility. Fast food companies must provide their consumers with proper food labels that enable them to make inform decision about what they eat. Label should not be falsified or misleading, the like in the example giving by Zinczenko about the misleading label on the chicken salad (393).He refers to the salad as not healthy and that it is a caloric death- trap aimed at eaters who will not suspect it. Although Balko makes some really good points, his objectives seem to me as a means to an end. Zinczenko cautions that there are few or no alternatives to what we eat and that things have to change. Balko cautions that allowing food regulations for labels means letting the government between you and your waistline. In either case, we as a people have a responsibility to consider what and how we eat.