Developments in reproductive technology Essay

With reference to relevant ethical theories, explain the arguments use to support developments in generative engine room. 35Reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilisation, pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection energize undoubtedly brought oft contentment to many people, and thitherfore many ethical systems support its development. A good place to start when considering the benefits of these technologies is the utilitarian view.Utilitarians believe that man has a intrinsic desire to honk based in human biology. Patrick Steptoe is quoted as stating that It is a fact that there is a biological desire to reproduce. Likewise, Peter Singer, famous utilitarian writer, in his defence of IVF refers to the desire for a child as being a very basic desire. If there is such a desire then there does seem to be a strong argument in favour of developing techniques to outperform infertility. Such an argument might be based on the utilitarian princ iple of maximising comfort. This possibleness claims that where there is a chaste choice to make the right thing to do is the legal action which is likely to produce the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. This theory starts with the happiness involved in a situation, takes into account the wider happiness of anyone else involved and takes the action that pass on produce this result of happiness. This theory nerves at the consequences and takes the action that will bring about the sought after results.The Utilitarian wishes to maximise happiness and inform the pain of infertility. When considering issues such as infertility we must not look at it in impersonal, philosophical terms. It is a problem that whoremonger provided be truly understood at human level. Those that have neer suffered infertility will not know the true pain of being unable to conceive. Since successful IVF treatment will bring an enormous tot up of happiness these theorists are in a greement with such treatments. In the movement of an unfruitful couple the utilitarian will look at the options purchasable and strive towards to goal of conception. To quote Laura Bush, For those who deeply want children and are denied them, those missing babies hover like silent ephemeral shadows over their lives.Moving on to situation ethics, this theory is in favour of reproductive technology if it is the intimately winsome course of action in the particular situation. It is not absolutist. This theory says that individual situations are different. This theory believes that there is only one key principle you do whatever is the roughly loving thing to do in a situation. Ethical rules are secondary. In the circumstances of an infertile couple you take the line of action which will be the most loving thing for a couple in their unique circumstances. in that location are many circumstances in which the use of reproductive technology would be the most loving course of action , such as when a same sex couple wish to experience parenthood. Techniques such as IVF using donor sperm/eggs so-and-so bring the joy of a child when they cannot conceive one indwellingly. Another more arguable scenario when a couple may benefit from reproductive technology would be when they desire a certain sex of child. Reproductive technology can accommodate consumerist type choices such as this. Using technologies to determine a childs g stamp outer before it is born could be considered loving because in certain countries, such as India and China, boys are more desired and therefore the child and family will have a higher attribute of life overall.Personal indecorum and choice is key to this debate. Personal autonomy is the capacity to decide for oneself and pursue a course of action in ones life, often regardless of any particular clean content. Whether or not reproductive technologies are moral should be have to the couple to decide, not the government, because it is a highly personal choice.Finally, born(p) impartiality is an ethical theory that is typically opposed to reproductive technology, because it is interfering with native conception. However, there are some Christians who believe that natural law can be reconciled with reproductive technologies. If God has said that the final end of sex is procreation, then the use of technology is instrumental to the pursuit of the natural ends, which have already been stipulated in doctrine. Thus, for example, IVF treatment allows us to pursue the natural end of reproduction through technological processes. After all, the Bible never directly mentions reproductive technologies. Nonetheless, this is still a minority view amongst proponents of natural law.Protestant churches tend to take a more lenient view. For example, the forgive Presbyterian Church accepts IVF provided that the couple are married, spare embryos are not created and no donors are used. Both the Methodist Church and the Church of En gland are instead positive about all forms of IVF and even permit research on spare embryos up to 14 days old because it can be of great help to doctors researching genetic diseases, although embryos should not be created solely for this purpose.Ultimately, reproductive technology causes us to rethink our views on family, marriage, sex and what makes a mother. no matter of our views, we should be compassionate towards those suffering from the effects of infertility. You cannot understand their situation unless you have experienced it personally.