knowledge and evidence Essay -- essays research papers fc

One definition of cognition is true tactual sensation based on loyal secernate. What makes order strong enough and how screwing this limit be established? The making of knowledge is the process in which personal opinion is fortified by pragmatic exhibit. It is to my belief that, evidence is a keystone in the justification of truth, because it is something solid and concrete. Significance of evidence is also magnified by our society as we develop. In major areas such as scientific investigations, judicial examinations, historical assessments and many some other field of knowledge, the esteem of creditable evidence are strongly advocated. darn evidence is a strong situationor in eliminating doubts of knowledge, different types of evidence can also affect the reliability of the truth claim which it supports. The charming line dividing valuable evidence and unreliable proof has since been stooln and debated over from the first schools of thoughts to todays broad palm of k nowledge. Likewise, I allow also call upon my declare experience and understanding to draw my own line in the grey vicinity of this spectrum. Before the declaration of my knowledge claims, I would like to clarify my understanding of evidence and its characteristics which will be the foundation of this discussion. On a broad view, evidence can be identified as a fact-like assertion that proves or disproves to a real degree a notion to be true, and trus twainrthy. On a contiguous examination, I realized, it is the evidences degree of relevance and authenticity that establishes its value and strength. Relevance, I believe, is the alliance which the evidence has with the theory that it is trying to uphold. As two things with strong connections tend to support each other, evidence with close relationship to the hypothesis, is also able to support the truth within that assumption. Authenticity, on the other hand, is the creditability of evidence. Only when the evidence is valid, wi ll the knowledge that it is trying to justify be accurate. Furthermore, evidences strength also lies within its objectivity and creditability. With slight personal bias, evidence will be regarded as objective, therefore easier to bind universally. At the end, creditability finalizes strong evidence through the influence of trust. Even though strong evidence can stand as a fact of i... ... imperfection of evidence can only be minimized, further cannot be eliminate, this eventually will result in few controversies. As we amaze better ways of finding stronger knowledge, the frequency of the controversies will also decrease. Subsequently, I believe, relevance, authenticity, objectivity and creditability are all strong factors in the acquirement of strong evidence, which ultimately affects the validation of knowledge. With different situation and within different fields of study, the degree of these four factors that determines strong evidence may vary, because of the difference in how truth is viewed. In this essay, I have presented my own view and draw my own line which may incorporate my own personal predisposition, but I believe, parts of my mark will still remain on that spectrum as genuine knowledge.(1,560)Bibliography The Committee On The Judiciary House of Representatives, federal Rules of Evidence, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 2001Evans, Colin A Question of Evidence The Casebook of massive Forensic Controversies, from Napoleon to O.J., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey, 2003