Organisational Behaviour Report Essay

Conflict is not confined at the singular level al single b atomic act 18ly is distincting itself more and more in organizations. Employees induct become more vociferous in their demands for a better deal. divers(a) departments in an organization face a situation full of conflicts collectable to a number of reasons like goal diversity, scarcity of resources or conundrum interdependence etc. Conflict Dysfunctional Conflict can keep back an interpersonal form. Conflict between individuals takes place owing to some(prenominal) factors, exactly virtually common are personal dislikes or personality differences.When in that respect are only differences of opinion between individuals almost task-related matters, it can be construed as technical conflict rather than interpersonal conflict. Technical and interpersonal conflicts whitethorn influence each separate due to role-related pressures. One may put the blame for low sales volume on the merchandise double-decker not meet ing his output signal schedule and may scrape disliking the production manager as an incompetent person. It is often very nasty to establish whether a conflict between two parties is due to manifest rational factors, or it emanates from hidden personal factors.Conflict Functional These types of inner conflicts arise frequently due to an individuals inability to line up to the group norms . Most groups have an idea of a fair daylights work and may pressurize an individual if he exceeds or falls short of the groups productivity norms. If the individual resents all much(prenominal) pressure or punishment, he could come into conflict with former(a) group members. Usually, it is very difficult for an individual to remain a group-member and at the same time, substantially deviate from the group norm. So, in most cases, either he conforms to the group norm or is rejected by the group.Of course, originally taking each such extreme step, he or the other group members try to influe nce each other through several mechanisms leading to different episodes of conflict. Analysis A lot of conflict is generated inwardly organizations because various groups within the organization hold conflicting values and encompass situations in a narrow, individualistic manner. An example that comes readily to mind is that of the managment-labour conflict. struggle feels that management is exploiting it because in spite of qualification a profit, management does aught for the economic welfare of labor.On the other hand, management feels that the profits should go to cash reserves so as to make the company an mesmeric proposition for investors. Another example is the conflict between engineering and manufacturing. engine room lays stress on technological sophistication and precision and is accused by manufacturing of designing products that will last for many years scarcely that the customers cannot afford. It is well-kept that since an organization is composed of individua l and they had different perceptions of goals and dithering values, conflict is form to arise in the organization.Managers of various departments have separate priorities and conflicting ideas about resource allocation. accordingly conflict is the unavoidable resultant role. Subordinates may clash with the manager over whether the work can be accomplished in the devoted period of time or not. They might even argue with subordinates at their own level over the best possible way to do a given job. Thus conflict is an unavoidable outcome but at the same time it is assumed that conflict need not always be detrimental. Under some circumstances it could focus on problems and instigate a search for better and more innovative solutions to problems.though conflict can lead to more creativity in problem solving and be beneficial to organization down the stairs certain conditions, but it is perceived that conflict as harmful something to be resolved erstwhile it arise. The views about h uman nature are that people are basically good trust, cooperation and goodness are given in human nature. Accordingly, the major(ip) antecedent conditions which induce aggressiveness and conflict in people are the faulty policies and structure resulting in distortion and breakdown in communication.Hence the managers role in resolving conflict is to animate understanding, trust and openness between parties. It is not easy to build a muscular corporate culture in any organization. A strong culture is based on strong ethics. This is very important for the triumph of the organization in the long-run. It is very easy to adopt short-cut methods to reach the realize but the downfall also comes at the same rate. Ethics realize that the organization does not adopt short-cut methods to achieve success instead it stresses on the concept of sustained success.Every organization has its own code of ethics and standards in a written form. The code of ethics normally contains the side by si de(p) points Honesty Fairness in practices of the companyDisclosing the inside information acquiring and using outside informationDisclosure of outside activities by the employer to the employee separately organization has its own set of code of ethics. Making negotiations has been identified as one of the primary responsibilities of any manager. Negotiations may involve allocating resources, investing detonating device or introducing new products.If resources like men, money, machines, materials, time and space were abundant, clearly any planning would be unnecessary. But, typically, resources are scarce and so there is a need for planning. Negotiation making is at the core of all aforethought(ip) activities. We can ill afford to waste scarce resources by making too many wrong negotiations or by remaining indecisive for too long a time, Negotiation making under fortune A negotiation is made under conditions of luck when a angiotensin-converting enzyme action may result in m ore than one potency outcome, but the relative fortune of each outcome is known.Negotiations under conditions of risk are perhaps the most common. In such situations, alternatives are recognized, but their resulting consequences are probabilistic and doubtful. While the alternatives are clear, the consequence is probabilistic and doubtful. Thus, a condition of risk may be said to exist. In practice, managers esteem the likelihood of various outcomes come onring based on past experience, research, and other information. A quality control inspector, for example, might determine the probability of number of rejects per production run.Likewise, a safety engineer might determine the probability of number of accidents occurring, or a personnel manager might determine the probability of a certain turnover or absenteeism rate. Negotiation making under uncertainty A negotiation is made under conditions of uncertainty when a single action may result in more than one potential outcome but the relative probability of each outcome is unknown. Negotiations under conditions of uncertainty are unquestionably the most difficult. In such situations a manager has no knowledge whatsoever on which to calculate the likely occurrence of various alternatives.Negotiations under uncertainty generally occur in cases where no historical data are available from which to popularize probabilities or in instances which are so novel and complex that it is unaccepted to make comparative judgments. Negotiations under complete uncertainty are as difficult to cite as example of decisions under absolute certainty. inclined even limited experience and the ability to generalize from past situations, most managers should be able to make at least some suppose of the probability of occurrence of various outcome.Nevertheless, there are undoubtedly generation when managers feel they are dealing with complete uncertainty. The number of factors to be considered and the life-size number of uncont rollable variables vital to the success of such a pretend can be mind-boggling On a personal level, the survival of the fittest of a job from among alternatives is a career decision that incorporates a enormous deal of uncertainty. The number of factors to be weighed and evaluated, often without comparable standards, can be overwhelming.