Epistemology Reason Essay Example for Free

Epistemology Reason EssayIs it true to say that there is no truth? The very nonion itself is contradictory, that is still a topic worth exploring. If a person were to completely when go nigh their life believing everything they ever heard or experienced to be true, they could be deceived without their own experienceledge. severalise they overheard someone talking about Sam Houston when they stated, and then Sam Houston claimed her land. Rightfully, without any former(a) companionship but their heard facts, the listener would assume Sam Houston to be a Samantha due to the possessive pronoun her. However, what the listener did not hear was the full sentence in which Eliza surrendered and then Sam Houston claimed her land. By basing their impression off of their senses of hearing, the listener was unable to acknowledge the truth behind the pronoun her. Similarly, in the case of epistemology, truth should not be simply based off of senses, or feelings, but off of soun d reasoning. However, sometimes senses jackpot be serviceable in arriving at a turn up truth. The rationalist solvent to the spatial relation of Epistemology states that all knowledge last comes through reason (Cowan/Spiegel, 52).This view claims that knowledge is proven true through deducing what is true from possible truths, as opposed to using the senses. As Descartes reasoned, truth discount be acquired if every belief is tested to be dark. Then, if it is proven that something cannot be inconclusive, it is therefore true. By taking a Biblical rationalist response to the view of Epistemology and using faith, Christians are able to acquire sound surety in their faith and view on what is true. Logic points to the rationalist response over all other views of epistemology.For example, the skeptical response states that truth is undoable and we have no knowledge. However, if this view is to be believed, then it disproves its own claim by showing that there is truth in believ ing there is no truth. Skeptics put forth absurd hypotheses that cannot be proven false, but at the same time have no way of universe shown true. For example, The Matrix, or Descartes belief in an evil genius who could potentially be controlling every aspect of life and domain have no way of proving this false.Summarily, the skeptic believes that there ultimately is no knowledge. This view mostly contradicts Christianity because the record book continually states from Genesis 35 For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes bequeath be opened, and you go away be like God, knowing good and evil to Revelation 315 I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other that knowledge does indeed exist. Therefore, if Christians believe in the scriptures, they also must believe that knowledge does exist.Another view that can be proven to be false is the empiricist response, which states that all knowledge arises from experience (Cowan/Spie gel, 54). This is the view is based largely off of feelings, sensations, and the experiences people learn from them. However, as exemplified in the introduction, sometimes senses fail. Anesthetics, holograms, sleep deprivation, noise recordings, candles and so some(prenominal) other factors can easily misguide senses. Proverbs 2333 states, Your eyes will see eery sights, and your mind will imagine confusing things. This verse shows that the mind doesnt always perceive what is being seen correctly. On the other hand, many people in the Bible were guided by their senses in visions, miracles, angels, and other events. Many times the Bible describes foolish people as being senseless (Psalm 926, Ecclesiastes 103, Jeremiah 521) but the senses can be swayed by the devil. 2 Timothy 226 says and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will. So while senses can be used by God, they can also be used by the devil and ulti mately should not be the deciding factor in determining what is true. People ought to not always rely on senses, but rather they should rely on the reasoning behind the senses and testing them to be false to turn back what is ultimately true. As Galileo alleged, Where the senses fail us, reason must step in. A Biblical rationalist response is the most logical response to take while trying to understand epistemology largely because it deduces all false options and true knowledge is only acquired through seeking God.By using Descartes method of proving false beliefs false to find what is true, rational thinking deduces what is true. Proverbs 17 says The affright of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge. Christians are only able to start to be able to attain knowledge when they start to reason and grasp how wide God truly is. Only when peoples thoughts are in the correct perspective can they begin to reason properly. Through awe, Christians are able to truly contain a proper fear through respect for God, and with that in turn, truly begin to know.