Legal duscuss unit4 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Legal duscuss unit4 - Essay ExampleFurther, the recreational benefit prevails over the risk of the kitty, and to remove the risk is a heavy burden on the land owner.Therefore, the courts finding on school of thought of attractive nuisance wound non change given the following fact that the pond is 300m sooner than 100m, and the increases of the depth of the pond from 6ft to 25ft means a heavy burden to the propertys owner to refill the pond. The clearness of the piss makes the visibility of any danger more visible than in muddy water. Similarly, the walkway make the pond a more recreation centre, and the age of the children being 3 $4 years does not equal a change in facts, because the parents should take care of the children rather than the property owner.The decision of the court should not change. The case of appeal has to succeed because there are no facts of this case distinguishing if from the precedent case of McDermott v. Kaczmarek, 2 Wn. App. 643, 469 p.2d 191 (1970). T his case set the rules as the condition having the probability of causing harm, the pond in Ochampaugh case is liable(predicate) to cause harm as the appellant had told the children never to go there alone. The pond is attractive to children, unguarded, and accessible, therefore, the plaintiff should be held liable for attractive doctrine seeks to protect